Supreme Court

WASHINGTON (CBS46) – A lawsuit involving the state of Georgia was granted certiorari by the United States Supreme Court and will be heard by the high court next year.

The case, Georgia, Et Al. vs. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., centers around an annotated copy of the laws of the state of Georgia. The state argues that the annotated version of the law is copyrighted and that the public has free access to that.

However, the official copy of the law is the annotated copy and activist Carl Malamud decided to publish the annotated copy online for public consumption for free and sent copies to legislators on USB drives. The state disagreed and said the annotated version is protected and sued Malamud and his organization for copyright infringement.

After losing at the trial level, Malamud won at the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeals court ruled:

“As a consequence, we conclude that the People are the ultimate authors of the annotations. As a work of the People the annotations are inherently public domain material and therefore uncopyrightable. Because we conclude that no copyright can be held in the annotations, we have no occasion to address the parties’ other arguments regarding originality and fair use.”

The case now resides before the Supreme Court which will issue a ruling next year on whether the annotated version of the law can be copyrighted.

Click here for more on the case from

Copyright 2019 WGCL-TV (Meredith Corporation). All rights reserved.

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.